Select header/footer to go to
Table of Contents
An unconscious patient is admitted into the hospital in cardiac arrest. Across the patient’s chest is tattooed: Do Not Resuscitate. There is no living will or durable power of attorney on record, and no surrogates are available. What does the medical practitioner do?
An unconscious patient is admitted into the hospital in cardiac arrest because of attempted suicide. Written with a Sharpie all over the patient’s body is Do Not Resuscitate! There is no living will or durable power of attorney on record, and no surrogates are available. What does the medical practitioner do?
A. Comply with the patient’s wishes and do not provide CPR.
B. Get a court order.
C. Get an ethics consultation.
D. Provide CPR.
[C13:3] Does a tattoo or Sharpie written on a patient’s body represent a legitimate form of informed consent?
[C13:4] In the first scenario, one would think that getting a tattoo would not be done without some careful and thoughtful consideration. However, there has probably been a case or two where this has not been the case. There is also no knowledge of when the person got the tattoo and whether or not the patient still holds to that supposed conviction. Nor is there any knowledge as to whether or not the patient had decision-making capacity when getting that tattoo.
[C13:5] In the second scenario, DNR has been written with a Sharpie all over a patient’s body. Certainly, it is clear that the writing on the body is very recent and, therefore, might be what the patient wants. However, there is no knowledge of whether or not someone wrote it on the patient as a joke, or maybe even because of malice. There is also no knowledge of whether or not the patient had decisional capacity if and when the patient wrote DNR on their body with the Sharpie.
[C13:6] Regardless, this is an emergency with the patient in cardiac arrest, so autonomous informed consent is by definition not possible under these conditions.
[C13:7] The professional obligations of beneficence (do good) and nonmaleficence (do no harm) require that practitioners in emergencies conduct treatments as directed by medical best practices. In both scenarios, that would be the performing of CPR.
[C13:8] The state has an interest in the protection and well-being of its citizens. Under emergencies where autonomy is impossible, the state encourages its citizens to help each other in need. This is evidenced by Good Samaritan laws which provide legal protection for aiding others with reasonable assistance.
[C13:9] Both scenarios indicate that medical standards of care would be to provide CPR.
[C13:10]
[C13:11] Provide CPR to both patients.
(Choice A) Comply with the patient’s wishes and do not provide CPR.
(Choice B) Get a court order.
(Choice C) Get an ethics consultation.
(Choice D) Provide CPR.
***
Assessment
TATTOO
SHARPIE
Principles
NO
CPR
NO
CPR
CPR
CPR
NA
NA
NA
NA
Autonomy
X
X
X
Beneficence
X
X
X
Nonmaleficence
Justice